Friends can help ensure a fair trial by giving a personal gift up to $420

You can also mail a check to:

"Ross Mirkarimi Legal Defense"

721 Webster St.

San Francisco, CA, 94117

NOTE: Any friend of Ross who is not a registered lobbyist and has not given a personal gift to Ross this year can give him a personal gift of up to $420, regardless of previous contributions, if any, to the Ross for Sheriff Campaign Committee.

Points to Consider

  • "Ross Mirkarimi has been sentenced in criminal court. Fulfilling his sentence is sufficient. Removing him from the office he was elected to by the people of San Francisco would be excessive. It would also deprive the San Franciscans who elected him of their chosen sheriff. As a social worker who has seen and worked with the devastation of domestic violence, I am signing this petition because I believe the court's sentence is the appropriate avenue of accountability. As long as the sheriff performs well in his job, he should not be removed from it."
  • "Some city officials are acting like fascists to try to remove a progressive public servant, democratically elected, who advocates for the under-represented."
  • "Ross' stance as a public servant has been to hold people accountable for their actions with punishment that fits the crime, provide opps for rehabilitation, allow for second chances, and look at the source of the problem. There are gradations of domestic violence and Ross' behavior is definitely at the lower end of the spectrum, so the punishment and rehabilitation requirements that he has been sentenced with seem sufficient to me. People voted for Ross because of his political stance on reducing recidivism and providing real opportunities for people to change for the better . . . I vote to give him a second chance and hope that people in the community, including advocates against domestic violence, allow him the opportunity to do his job and work on his personal relationships at the same time."
  • "Enough already, he has been pilloried in the press, prosecuted and punished. He and his family have suffered enough. Let them heal and let him do the job he was elected to. This city has been riddled with corruption for decades, primarily as a result of the collusion between City Hall, the Pac Heights Mob, 'Downtown' and assorted civic 'leaders'. If "The Press", our elected representatives and guardians of the law spent as much time and effort investigating and prosecuting these white collar criminals we might not be in such dire straits."
  • "Ed Lee has no right to nullify my vote. Normally, I would say that we have a secret ballot in this country, but under these circumstances, I will make my vote public and say that I voted for Ross Mirkarimi and I want him to be the Sheriff of the City and County of San Francisco. Who is Ed Lee to nullify my vote? If the domestic violence advocates want to recall him, then we can cross that bridge when we come to it. But we're not there yet, are we?"
  • "DA Gascon concluded justice was served in response to Ross' admission of an innocuous mistake that neither involved force nor intention to harm. The City Attorney and Mayor knew that Ross only waived his fundamental rights including jury trial in reliance on the prospect of reconciliation with Eliana and resumption of his career. The Mayor suspended Ross as Sheriff with neither pay nor process. In filing official misconduct charges for Ross' expulsion from office, the City Attorney failed to comply with the City Charter by gaining the Board's approval for the City Attorney to represent the Mayor. Why didn't DA Gascon speak out against the City Attorney and Mayor when he knew their actions to defy Ross' expectations in plea bargaining? Instead, the DA got on his soapbox with a false claim that Ross admitted to much more than he did. The DA, the City Attorney and the Mayor have each maligned their respective offices in actions that warrant the label misconduct. Ross was neither in office nor committed misconduct, so set him free of these additional proceedings before the Ethics Commission and Board of Supes that defy the benefit of his bargain. Thank you for your consideration."
  • "This has not been a prosecution but rather a persecution of Ross Mirkarimi and his family. The people of SF voted him in. If bruising his wife's arm in the course of an argument about how long she should keep their son in Venezuela is such a big deal, the people of SF get to determine that at the next election. 
We saw what a big deal it was when Newsom committed adultery with his campaign manager's wife, and when Mayor Lee vowed not to run and then allowed his volunteers to collect prefilled ballots. These would seem to have more of a “nexus” between the office and the misconduct to me. 
I am astounded by the successive rounds of attack in this case, which has no such nexus - first the over-inflated criminal charges and virtual conviction without trial by the Chronicle, then Mayor Lee's suspension without pay edict, now an unprecedented ethics commission hearing for which no one really knows the rules, and finally, another hearing before the Supes as to whether he can keep the position we elected him to. This is a political charade and needs to stop."
  • "I am appalled at the lies being perpetuated about Mr. Mirkarimi. Please find out the truth of what happened according to Mr. Mirkarimi's wife instead of railroading him for political reasons. I am a female voter of District 5."
  • "Ross is a decent, brilliant man with so much to offer this city. The indignities he suffered at the hands of the system and the press will only make him a stronger sheriff. He has been humiliated and punished enough, far out of proportion to the bruising. Let him get back to his family and back to his job."
  • "Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi should be reinstated. He should be allowed to serve the term to which we, the People of San Francisco, have elected him. If ever someone has been subjected to excessive, cruel and unusual punishment, for an admittedly stupid and wrong act, he has. His wife and son have been greatly harmed as well. It is time to Move On. It is time to allow the family to come back together and heal. It is time for the Sheriff's Department to have the progressive leadership which Sheriff Mirkarimi will provide. Carol Ruth Silver, former Director, SF Sheriff's Department Prisoner Legal Services."
  • "I want a sheriff who understands from personal knowledge the value of restorative justice. Because of the city's attack, and Sheriff Mirkarimi's dignifying response, he is the sheriff who can implement the restorative justice we need and voted for."
  • "It's transparently obvious that the actions against Mirkarimi are politically and economically motivated. Domestic violence and use of political power in a domestic relationship (if this occurred) are serious matters, but the way this is being handled makes it clear that it's all about political power and and economic agenda to further gentrify SF."
  • "Let's have a women's demo in SUPPORT of Ross - he will make San Francisco a safer and healthier place for women, children and all of us!"
  • "I am primarily concerned about the people in San Francisco City and County jails. Under the decades long leadership of Sheriff Hennessey, the SF jails have developed some humane educational and service programs for incarcerated people. Ross Mirkarimi has promised to continue those programs. The other sheriff-candidates wanted to 'lock 'em up and throw away the key.' Imprisoned San Franciscans deserve to be treated with human rights and dignity. That's why I want to see Ross Mirkarimi retain his position as Sheriff in SF."
  • "Mayor Lee declined to even meet with Ross’s wife to learn the facts. This is disrespectful of the Mirkarimi family and the process, and Ed Lee needs to hear from us very clearly that he has crossed the line."
  • As I've made clear on my blog during Mirkarimi's years as District 5 Supervisor, I think he's been an awful supervisor based on the positions he's taken on a number of issues. But the domestic incident that ended with his plea bargain doesn't rise to a level of official misconduct. The people of SF elected him Sheriff and only the people should be allowed to remove him through a recall or the next election."
  • "As a registered San Francisco voter, I personally will not support any politician that tries to undo what we the voters did in the voting booth. This incident is sad but it does not rise the the level of domestic abuse. This case was tried in the court of public opinion which violated Sheriff Mirkarimi's right to a fair and speedy trial. Counseling was the most that should have come out of this. I hope the registered voters in SF will come together and make sure that our voice is heard for every one of them who doesn't stand up for what's right."
  • "I am a retired social worker who worked extensively in domestic violence, including murder/suicide. Without minimizing what occurred, the incident between Mr. Mirkarimi and his wife falls at the low end of the scale while the media coverage of it has been frenzied, even gleeful. The kind of attention it has received has been out of proportion to the deed. The court, too, appears to have treated Mr. Mirkarimi as though he had done something at the upper end of the scale. It took him a long time to gain permission to see his son once he appeared to have been evaluated out by SF CPS, and his wife still cannot see him even though she has stated she wanted to. Mr. Mirkarimi should have just pled out to the lesser charge & tuned himself into a learning tool for the issue from the beginning, but now that he has taken responsibility, the DV Consortium, the Mayor, and the DA just want blood. There are plenty of people all over the Hall of Justice who have committed much the same thing and worse w/o consequences. Mr. Mirkarimi's and his wife's treatment has not been fair."

standwithross@gmail.com



Site maintained and customized by ito2webdesign.com